Thursday, December 15, 2005
Wednesday, December 14, 2005
I thought this Call for Papers might interest some of you:
Writing in the Interdisciplines: A Student's Guide to Writing about
Literature and Media
Proposals/contributions are invited for an edited anthology offering
concrete advice to undergraduate students on approaches to writing on
literature, media, and cultural studies. This collection is intended
for interdisciplinary courses in departments such as American
Studies, Women's/Gender Studies, and Ethnic/Area Studies in which
students have had little or no previous training on writing about
cultural texts (i.e. literature, film, television, and music).
Entries may cover issues such as style, technical terms, critical
theories, research approaches, and more.
Please send 250 word abstract proposals by January 6, 2006 to K.
Chisholm (kamikaze@ucsc.edu).
=========================================
From the Literary Calls for Papers Mailing List
CFP@english.upenn.edu
Full Information at
http://cfp.english.upenn.edu
or write Jennifer Higginbotham: higginbj@english.upenn.edu
Writing in the Interdisciplines: A Student's Guide to Writing about
Literature and Media
Proposals/contributions are invited for an edited anthology offering
concrete advice to undergraduate students on approaches to writing on
literature, media, and cultural studies. This collection is intended
for interdisciplinary courses in departments such as American
Studies, Women's/Gender Studies, and Ethnic/Area Studies in which
students have had little or no previous training on writing about
cultural texts (i.e. literature, film, television, and music).
Entries may cover issues such as style, technical terms, critical
theories, research approaches, and more.
Please send 250 word abstract proposals by January 6, 2006 to K.
Chisholm (kamikaze@ucsc.edu).
=========================================
From the Literary Calls for Papers Mailing List
CFP@english.upenn.edu
Full Information at
http://cfp.english.upenn.edu
or write Jennifer Higginbotham: higginbj@english.upenn.edu
Friday, December 09, 2005
Hi, All.
As I mentioned for my project, I am organizing with Jason a conference devoted to Scientific Writing. The featured speaker is Judy Swan, whose article ("Whose literature is science") we read a few weeks ago. Another article of hers, which I found very insightful, is
The science of scientific writing .
I have also posted below the (very tentative) discription of the conference. We are also planning to have a website for the conference. Feedback is always welcome!
Bob
Science Writing at Queens College
March 31, 2005
Science Writing at Queens College, a one-day conference, will bring together students and faculty in Mathematics and the Natural Sciences with CUNY Writing Fellows to discuss writing pedagogy and practices in the sciences, at Queens and beyond.
The featured guest is Judith Swan (Assistant Director of Scientific and Technical Writing, Princeton University), who holds a Ph.D. in Biochemistry from MIT and is a world-renowned expert on science writing who has consulted with university faculty and professional scientists at institutions as diverse the University of Pennsylvania, The Center for Disease Control, and the Japanese Institute of Basic Biology. Swan will conduct a morning seminar with students and faculty, consult individually with student and faculty throughout the day, and conduct a workshop on writing pedagogy for faculty in the afternoon.
We have a variety of aims for the conference: to stimulate cross-disciplinary conversation about teaching science with writing; provide a forum for faculty and students to discuss their concerns about writing; showcase innovative writing pedagogy throughout the Division; stimulate departmental conversations about writing pedagogy and writing-intensive courses; and assemble a working group of conference participants in leadership roles to initiate CUNY-wide conversations on writing and general education—a prospect we have discussed with Judith Summerfield, University Dean of Undergraduate Education.
The primary organizers of the conference are Robert Cowen (Professor, Mathematics) and Jason Tougaw (Assistant Professor, English and Coordinator, Office of College Writing Programs). Other faculty interested in participating include Steven Schwarz (Professor, Physics), Wilma Saffran (Associate Professor, Chemistry and Biochemistry) George Axelrad (Professor Emeritus, Chemistry and Biochemistry), Alex Ryba (Professor, Computer Science), John Terilla ( Assistant Professor, Mathematics). .
SCHEDULE
9:00 – 9:30
Coffee and Bagels
9:30 – 11:00
Morning Seminar
Judith Swan will lead a morning seminar for faculty and students, focusing on interconnections between writing and scientific thinking. This will be an interarctive seminar, with participants contributing their knowledge and experience.
11:00 – 12:30
Student Poster Session
This will showcase selected student work, with faculty present to discuss the student projects with students and faculty in attendance.
12:30 – 1:30
Lunch
1:30 – 3:00
Faculty Roundtable
The roundtable is intended to stimulate discussion of the pedagogical and professional possibilities of a spectrum of science writing, including the lab report, the mathematical proof, the peer-reviewed journal article, public weblogs, daily journals, science journalism, and essays on the history or philosophy of science.
3:15 – 4:45
Afternoon Workshop for Faculty
Judith Swan will conduct an afternoon workshop on writing pedagogy, focusing on the classroom implications of the ideas discussed in the morning seminar.
4:45 – 5:15
Coffee and Cookies
5:15 – 6:15
Departmental Working Groups
Faculty will assemble in departmental groups. A faculty member from each department will lead a discussion of the specific implications of the day’s events for their department, with a particular focus on adding more writing to the curriculum. Faculty will complete and discuss surveys about their use of writing in the classroom.
As I mentioned for my project, I am organizing with Jason a conference devoted to Scientific Writing. The featured speaker is Judy Swan, whose article ("Whose literature is science") we read a few weeks ago. Another article of hers, which I found very insightful, is
The science of scientific writing .
I have also posted below the (very tentative) discription of the conference. We are also planning to have a website for the conference. Feedback is always welcome!
Bob
Science Writing at Queens College
March 31, 2005
Science Writing at Queens College, a one-day conference, will bring together students and faculty in Mathematics and the Natural Sciences with CUNY Writing Fellows to discuss writing pedagogy and practices in the sciences, at Queens and beyond.
The featured guest is Judith Swan (Assistant Director of Scientific and Technical Writing, Princeton University), who holds a Ph.D. in Biochemistry from MIT and is a world-renowned expert on science writing who has consulted with university faculty and professional scientists at institutions as diverse the University of Pennsylvania, The Center for Disease Control, and the Japanese Institute of Basic Biology. Swan will conduct a morning seminar with students and faculty, consult individually with student and faculty throughout the day, and conduct a workshop on writing pedagogy for faculty in the afternoon.
We have a variety of aims for the conference: to stimulate cross-disciplinary conversation about teaching science with writing; provide a forum for faculty and students to discuss their concerns about writing; showcase innovative writing pedagogy throughout the Division; stimulate departmental conversations about writing pedagogy and writing-intensive courses; and assemble a working group of conference participants in leadership roles to initiate CUNY-wide conversations on writing and general education—a prospect we have discussed with Judith Summerfield, University Dean of Undergraduate Education.
The primary organizers of the conference are Robert Cowen (Professor, Mathematics) and Jason Tougaw (Assistant Professor, English and Coordinator, Office of College Writing Programs). Other faculty interested in participating include Steven Schwarz (Professor, Physics), Wilma Saffran (Associate Professor, Chemistry and Biochemistry) George Axelrad (Professor Emeritus, Chemistry and Biochemistry), Alex Ryba (Professor, Computer Science), John Terilla ( Assistant Professor, Mathematics). .
SCHEDULE
9:00 – 9:30
Coffee and Bagels
9:30 – 11:00
Morning Seminar
Judith Swan will lead a morning seminar for faculty and students, focusing on interconnections between writing and scientific thinking. This will be an interarctive seminar, with participants contributing their knowledge and experience.
11:00 – 12:30
Student Poster Session
This will showcase selected student work, with faculty present to discuss the student projects with students and faculty in attendance.
12:30 – 1:30
Lunch
1:30 – 3:00
Faculty Roundtable
The roundtable is intended to stimulate discussion of the pedagogical and professional possibilities of a spectrum of science writing, including the lab report, the mathematical proof, the peer-reviewed journal article, public weblogs, daily journals, science journalism, and essays on the history or philosophy of science.
3:15 – 4:45
Afternoon Workshop for Faculty
Judith Swan will conduct an afternoon workshop on writing pedagogy, focusing on the classroom implications of the ideas discussed in the morning seminar.
4:45 – 5:15
Coffee and Cookies
5:15 – 6:15
Departmental Working Groups
Faculty will assemble in departmental groups. A faculty member from each department will lead a discussion of the specific implications of the day’s events for their department, with a particular focus on adding more writing to the curriculum. Faculty will complete and discuss surveys about their use of writing in the classroom.
Becoming a Proficient Writer: The Important Role of Peer Learning
Hefer Bembenutty
I would like to investigate the role of peers as active agents to facilitate the writing learning experience of each other in an undergraduate educational psychology course for teacher candidates. During my teaching career, I have found that peers are able to provide effective feedback to each other and help to develop critical thinking and to explore epistemological beliefs among themselves.
In educational psychology courses, little emphasis is placed on peer learning and help seeking from peers during the writing process. At the college level, acquisition of writing proficiency, editing, responding to writing, and evaluating writing come primarily from the instructors. The instructors create and grade the written assignments. However, help seeking from peers is considered a self-regulatory learning strategy known to enhance academic performance, acquisition of literacy, and writing expertise (Newman, 1994; Zimmerman & Kitsantas, 1997, 1999; Zimmerman & Risemberg, 1997 ). The implicit idea in current practice is that peers have little to contribute to the learning and writing experience of each other. An important way in which peers learn from each other to acquire writing dexterity is by engaging in self-observation, peer observation, emulation, and self-reflection. Through observational learning, peers could encourage each other to engage in critical thinking, drafting, revision, editing, proofreading, and to explore their epistemological beliefs.
Acquisition of writing dexterity is a long-term process involving high-quality instruction and peers can help to facilitate the writing process. Peers can help writers to adopt many self-regulatory techniques such as drafting, revision, editing, proofreading to direct and sustain their writing process and providing effective feedback to each other.
I would like to learn ways in which I can help my students, who are teacher candidates, to engage in a peer learning experience during the writing process of the course’s assignments. My students will be assigned to write two self-reflective papers in which they will have to evaluate developmental and learning theories as they apply to classroom situations. However, the students will be required to share with their peer their papers in such a way that they can engage in critical thinking, drafting, revision, editing, proof-reading, and exploring their epistemological beliefs.
I am interested to uncover what are the learning strategies that peers use to help each other during the writing process. Would they use elaboration, rehearsal, mapping, outlining, clustering, and organization?
I am also interested to find what are the personal characteristics that are associated with a successful writing process. Specifically, I will be curious to learn whether peer interaction during the writing process facilitate self-regulation of learning, delay of gratification, and motivation among each other.
References
Newman, R. S. (1994). Adaptive help seeking: A strategy of self-regulated learning.In D. Schunk & B. Zimmerman (Eds. ), Self-regulation of learning and performance: Issues and educational applications(pp. 283-301). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Zimmerman, B. J. & Kitsantas, A. (1997). Developmental phases in self-regulation: Shifting from process goals to outcome goals. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 29-36.
Zimmerman, B. J. & Kitsantas, A. (1999). Acquiring writing revision skill: Shifting from process to outcome self-regulatory goals. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 241-250.
Zimmerman, B. J. & Risemberg, R. (1997). Becoming a proficient writer: A self-regulatory perspective. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 22, 73-101.
Hefer Bembenutty
I would like to investigate the role of peers as active agents to facilitate the writing learning experience of each other in an undergraduate educational psychology course for teacher candidates. During my teaching career, I have found that peers are able to provide effective feedback to each other and help to develop critical thinking and to explore epistemological beliefs among themselves.
In educational psychology courses, little emphasis is placed on peer learning and help seeking from peers during the writing process. At the college level, acquisition of writing proficiency, editing, responding to writing, and evaluating writing come primarily from the instructors. The instructors create and grade the written assignments. However, help seeking from peers is considered a self-regulatory learning strategy known to enhance academic performance, acquisition of literacy, and writing expertise (Newman, 1994; Zimmerman & Kitsantas, 1997, 1999; Zimmerman & Risemberg, 1997 ). The implicit idea in current practice is that peers have little to contribute to the learning and writing experience of each other. An important way in which peers learn from each other to acquire writing dexterity is by engaging in self-observation, peer observation, emulation, and self-reflection. Through observational learning, peers could encourage each other to engage in critical thinking, drafting, revision, editing, proofreading, and to explore their epistemological beliefs.
Acquisition of writing dexterity is a long-term process involving high-quality instruction and peers can help to facilitate the writing process. Peers can help writers to adopt many self-regulatory techniques such as drafting, revision, editing, proofreading to direct and sustain their writing process and providing effective feedback to each other.
I would like to learn ways in which I can help my students, who are teacher candidates, to engage in a peer learning experience during the writing process of the course’s assignments. My students will be assigned to write two self-reflective papers in which they will have to evaluate developmental and learning theories as they apply to classroom situations. However, the students will be required to share with their peer their papers in such a way that they can engage in critical thinking, drafting, revision, editing, proof-reading, and exploring their epistemological beliefs.
I am interested to uncover what are the learning strategies that peers use to help each other during the writing process. Would they use elaboration, rehearsal, mapping, outlining, clustering, and organization?
I am also interested to find what are the personal characteristics that are associated with a successful writing process. Specifically, I will be curious to learn whether peer interaction during the writing process facilitate self-regulation of learning, delay of gratification, and motivation among each other.
References
Newman, R. S. (1994). Adaptive help seeking: A strategy of self-regulated learning.In D. Schunk & B. Zimmerman (Eds. ), Self-regulation of learning and performance: Issues and educational applications(pp. 283-301). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Zimmerman, B. J. & Kitsantas, A. (1997). Developmental phases in self-regulation: Shifting from process goals to outcome goals. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 29-36.
Zimmerman, B. J. & Kitsantas, A. (1999). Acquiring writing revision skill: Shifting from process to outcome self-regulatory goals. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 241-250.
Zimmerman, B. J. & Risemberg, R. (1997). Becoming a proficient writer: A self-regulatory perspective. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 22, 73-101.




